# Performance attribution (Brinson-Fachler) Periods: P1, P2 | Linking: Carino (log-linked, sums exactly to the cumulative active return) ## Summary The portfolio returned +6.22% against +5.53% for the benchmark, so it beat by 70 bps. The biggest driver was the overlap of the two (interaction) at +50 bps, then sector bets (allocation) at +39 bps and stock picking (selection) at -19 bps. Tech helped most (+88 bps), mostly from the holdings picked inside it. Energy hurt most (-46 bps), mostly from the holdings picked inside it. ## Cumulative, linked Portfolio +6.2232% | Benchmark +5.5250% | Active +0.6982% | Sector | Allocation | Selection | Interaction | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Tech | +0.3013% | +0.3820% | +0.2009% | +0.8843% | | Health | +0.1581% | +0.0148% | +0.1054% | +0.2783% | | Energy | -0.0725% | -0.5879% | +0.1960% | -0.4644% | | **Total** | +0.3870% | -0.1910% | +0.5022% | +0.6982% | ## Period P1 Portfolio +5.8000% | Benchmark +5.0000% | Active +0.8000% | Sector | Wp | Rp | Wb | Rb | Allocation | Selection | Interaction | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Tech | +50.00% | +10.00% | +40.00% | +8.00% | +0.3000% | +0.8000% | +0.2000% | +1.3000% | | Health | +30.00% | +4.00% | +30.00% | +5.00% | +0.0000% | -0.3000% | +0.0000% | -0.3000% | | Energy | +20.00% | -2.00% | +30.00% | +1.00% | +0.4000% | -0.9000% | +0.3000% | -0.2000% | | **Total** | | | | | +0.7000% | -0.4000% | +0.5000% | +0.8000% | ## Period P2 Portfolio +0.4000% | Benchmark +0.5000% | Active -0.1000% | Sector | Wp | Rp | Wb | Rb | Allocation | Selection | Interaction | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Tech | +40.00% | -5.00% | +40.00% | -4.00% | +0.0000% | -0.4000% | +0.0000% | -0.4000% | | Health | +40.00% | +3.00% | +30.00% | +2.00% | +0.1500% | +0.3000% | +0.1000% | +0.5500% | | Energy | +20.00% | +6.00% | +30.00% | +5.00% | -0.4500% | +0.3000% | -0.1000% | -0.2500% | | **Total** | | | | | -0.3000% | +0.2000% | +0.0000% | -0.1000% | _Not financial advice. Attribution explains past returns; it does not predict future ones._